Thinking Activity : Marxism, Feminism, Queer theory and Ecocritisim

 Hello readers !!! 


I'm Latta Baraiya and I'm a student of the English department, MKBU. Today in this blog I'm going to discuss about the theories; Marxism, Ecocriticism, Feminism and Queer criticism. This thinking Activity is assigned by our professor Dilip Barad sir. So let's see how this criticism works in different fields. 


  • Marxist criticism


Before beginning the example of reading criticism in a text, first we have to understand what is Marxism ? and what is Marxist criticism ? What do they do ?




So first I would like to give one definition of Marxism. This is the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, later developed by their followers to form the basis of communism. According to Merriam Webster,  


This is a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society. 


So we can say that Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that uses a materialist interpretation of historical development, better known as historical materialism, to understand class relations and social conflict as well as a dialectical perspective to view social transformation. Now let's try looking at the society created in a classic piece of literature, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. This book takes place in the American South in the 19th century and follows a white boy, Huck, as he helps a black slave, Jim, escape his situation. Here we've got quite a bit more detail. Instead of just two large classes, society is really divided into several smaller ones.


As a result, a Marxist critique would focus not only on those classes, but also what happens when they break down. After all, Huck and Jim form a bond that society would have forbidden. Because of this, it would be argued that Twain wanted society to get rid of race-based castes altogether, since they only kept humanity in bondage.


  • Feminist criticism 


Are a feminist ? This question might be coming to your mind and also asked by somebody many times. So what is Feminism and how does it work ? That we will see here. First, let’s understand what feminism is meant to be.




If you look up the definition of “Feminism” in the dictionary, you’ll see these statements:


Feminism is:


1. The advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.


2. The theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.


3. The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities.


4. The doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. 


Now let's read feminism in The Great Gatsby. In the 21st century, it may be difficult to imagine a time when women were not even allowed to vote. However, prior to 1920, when the U.S. Congress ratified the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, female American citizens did not enjoy this right. The Great Gatsby takes place just two years after the ratification of this amendment during the Jazz Age. The Jazz Age, also known as the Roaring Twenties, was a time of dramatic cultural, economic, and social change in America, where not only men, but also women, drank and engaged in extramarital sex.  


Myrtle Wilson, Tom Buchanan's mistress, is another example of females as property in The Great Gatsby. Tom even refers to Myrtle as 'his girl' when he talks about her to others. However, Myrtle is also her husband's, George Wilson's, girl, an auto mechanic who does not provide her with the lifestyle she desires. As a means of escape from her economically and emotionally unhappy marriage, Myrtle looks to another man to satisfy her needs. 


  • Queer theory


Countries like India have not started to give importance to the third gender yet. So it is very pivotal to study them also. They are also human beings, they have equal rights, they have their dreams though all should see them as human beings. So the first thing I would like to discuss here is what is queer theory ? 




If we look Queer Theory (QT) is both theory and political action. Definition is impossible, but QT can be summarised as exploring the oppressive power of dominant norms, particularly those relating to sexuality, and the immiseration they cause to those who cannot, or do not wish to, live according to those norms. 


According to Dr. Mary Klages, UC Boulder ; 


The word "queer" in queer theory has some of these connotations, particularly its alignment with ideas about homosexuality. Queer theory is a brand-new branch of study or theoretical speculation; it has only been named as an area since about 1991. It grew out of gay/lesbian studies, a discipline which itself is very new, existing in any kind of organized form only since about the mid-1980s. Gay/lesbian studies, in turn, grew out of feminist studies and feminist theory. 


Have a look at this video :- 




 


Shakespeare’s male dominated sonnets are most closely viewed in contemporary literature through Oscar Wilde’s The Portrait of Mr. W.H. This is one of the first pieces of literature that openly explores gay themes, a coming-out story of a sorts. This story follows a protagonist coming to terms with his sexuality with the help of Shakespeare’s sonnets, giving a very contemporary reading to these classic texts. The idea that the queer language within these texts can be used to help this character to understand such a large aspect of his life has given further appreciation to the writing and the subject matter.


The related theme within these sonnets relates directly to the “young man”, the narrator expresses his desire of admiring the man’s beauty, and that he wishes the man to sire a male heir, perhaps so he may pass on his beauty to future generations. This is clearly stated in Sonnet 3:


Look in thy glass and tell the face thou viewest


Now is the time that face should forme an other;


Whose fresh repair if now thou not renewest,


Thou dost beguile the world, unbless some mother.

(Sonnet 3) 


The way in which the narrator wishes to capture the “young man’s” beauty by having a child contrasts with the narrator's idea that the “young man’s” beauty is being wasted as time goes on. The internal conflict can be seen within these sonnets in the way that the narrator explores conventional beauty and compares that which he sees in the “young man” and the “dark lady”. The poet personifies the notions of time and love in his sonnets, with negative and positive connotations. The concept of time is connected to the “young man”, through a parallel to beauty, there is an anxiety in the “young man’s” fading beauty that time will soon decay. Natural imagery is often used to mirror the “young man’s” beauty as nature too is only beautiful for a short period before time takes its toll, “Now is the time that face should form another”. 


The other example is Orlando : A Biography by Virginia Woolf. In which we see protagonist Orlando change his sex from man to woman. This is important and interesting example of queer theory to study.



  • Ecocriticism


You all were aware about what ecocriticism is.




Ecocriticism is the study of literature and environment from an interdisciplinary point of view where all sciences come together to analyze the environment and brainstorm possible solutions for the correction of the contemporary environmental situation. Ecocriticism was officially heralded by the publication of two seminal works, both published in the mid-1990s: The Ecocriticism Reader, edited by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, and The Environmental Imagination, by Lawrence Buell. 


Ecocritics believe that we also have to investigate the concept of nature itself. Societies frequently view their own hierarchies and codes of conduct as natural, rather than as artificial and man-made. Literary texts can help us realize how human beings use nature for their own ends. 


A great example of an ecocritical reading of Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”


Wordsworth treats the daffodils like a photo on a postcard. Wordsworth doesn’t involve himself in nature. Instead, he looks at nature from afar (like a cloud), and leaves as soon as he had his fill. In other words, Wordsworth acts like the tourist who comes by once and snaps a quick picture before moving on. In the end, Wordsworth seems more concerned about his own feelings than about nature, Wordsworth composes the landscape into aesthetic form from a single point, located outside that landscape, exactly in the manner of a picturesque viewer, and in the process constructs a purely visual and seemingly disembodied subjectivity. Even as he claims to connect to nature, he views that nature through a kind of invisible frame and turns it into a resource for the construction of his own seemingly autonomous self. 


Wordsworth is being too selective in his representation of the environment. In fact, Wordsworth’s attitude to the way Americans treasure their National Parks as perfect and pristine natural places, while caring less about the degradation of nature everywhere else.   

An Astrologer's Day Short Story and Movie Adaptation

 


Do you believe in astrology ? Many of you might be believing in that. Well many of you think whether astrologers are saying right or only they are making us fools. So today's blog is about astrology and how astrologers spend their days making people fools. I'm Latta Baraiya and I'm a student of the English Department, MKBU. This task is assigned by Vaidehi ma'am. To know more about the task click here. So let's discuss… 


First I would like to talk about the short story "An Astrologer's Day" by R. K. Narayan





Rasipuram Krishnaswami Iyer Narayanaswami born on 10 October 1906 and died on 13 May 2001, commonly known as R. K. Narayan, was an Indian writer known for his work set in the fictional South Indian town of Malgudi. He was a leading author of early Indian literature in English along with Mulk Raj Anand and Raja Rao. To read more about R. K. Narayan click here


The short story "An Astrologer's Day" is a very interesting story to read. An Astrologer's Day is a thriller, suspense short story by author R. K. Narayan. While it had been published earlier, it was the titular story of Narayan's fourth collection of short stories published in 1947 by Indian Thought Publications. It was the first chapter of the world famous collection of stories Malgudi Days which was later telecasted on television in 2006. 




This is a story about a man who runs away from his home and pretends to be an astrologer after imagining that he has committed a murder. In a strange situation, an ironic twist of fate, he runs into the very man he thought he had killed. 




This story tells us how fake astrologers make people fool. It happens because they know some common terms for allure people. And if you are tense, in pain, or unhappy, you are going to attract them. This common trick they use. Not only astrologers but politicians, religious sant and Tantrik also. 


Click here to read the full story. 


If we talk about the movie adaptation it captures the subject very well. We have several changes in the movie also, that I will discuss in the questions given below. 


You can watch the movie here. Click on this link :- 


https://youtu.be/TkfrjYFQozA 


Here are some questions to ponder upon :-


👉How faithful is the movie to the original short story?


The adaptation is good. It portrayed the subject of a story well. But here we can see some changes in the adaptation. The character of the daughter of that astrologer is completely missing in the original short story. It was added by the director in the movie adaptation. If we look at the story, some situations were changed in the movie adaptation. 



👉After watching the movie, have your perception about the short story, characters or situations changed?


If I talk about the story, I thought that story might end with the explosion of the astrologer. But at the end the story continued with the daily work which he is doing everyday. But the movie helped me to understand the concept very clearly. 


👉Do you feel ‘aesthetic delight’ while watching the movie? If yes, exactly when did it happen? If not, can you explain with reasons?


Yes. I feel aesthetic delight while watching the movie. If I talk about the exact time it happened when the mystery of Gurunanak was solved. While watching I'm very much aware of the relationship between the astrologer and Gurunanak. It also happened when the wife of an astrologer asked him to go back to their village and he denied. And why they leave their village. That time also I feel like there is something behind this. But when astrologer were afraid of Gurunanak, something was linked in my mind. I thought there was some connection between them. And later on we see what happened in the past. So that time I feel aesthetic delight. 


👉Does screening of movie help you in better understanding of the short story?


Yes. Screening of the movie helped me a lot to understand the short story "An Astrologer's Day". Because watching movies is more effective than reading. But the point to be noted is if we want to know deeply about a story or anything I must prefer to read a book. Movies have some limitations that can be solved by reading the original book only. But our concept becomes clear while watching the movie. Movie also uses different camera angles to explore their aesthetic. And that is useful to understand the main focus of the story. So the movie screening helped me to understand how the story was portrayed. Visual medium is also effective. So we can easily remember what we have seen rather than what we have read. 


👉Was there any particular scene or moment in the story that you think was perfect?


According to me, the movie captures the subject very well. Everything is perfect through the characters. All scenes also interlinked with each other. 


👉If you are the director, what changes would you like to make in the remaking of the movie based on the short story “An Astrologer’s Day” by R.K.Narayan? 


As a director of the movie I would like to change some shots of the movie. 


  • First I will change the sequence of the movie. I prefer to share the scene of exposition first. Because it creates a curiosity in the audience to know why it's happening and what are the reasons behind it. That can make them connected with the film. 


  • I will change the character of the wife of that astrologer. Because she didn't ask her husband about why he is doing this job, why he is cheating so many people. Instead of resisting, she behaves softly with her husband. She has to be a woman with dignity about the work they are doing. 


  • If we look at her she is also unemployed. So I will make her do this kind of job so that she will earn some money. So she can face her husband also. 


  • The other chance I will have is that I will try to expose the true reality of the astrologers. Who makes fools of people. At the end of the story they will be exposed by one educated person, because uneducated people are easily allured by this type of astrologer. So I will try to hide my face in front of people.


  • If we think people learn things from their failure. So I think that should be included in the movie that after exposure he changes his job and becomes a good human being ! 


So these types of changes I will make if I'm a director of the movie.  I also recommend you to read the short story. If you haven't time to read full story, at least watch the movie adaptation of the story.

Thinking Activity : Derrida and Deconstruction

As a student of criticism, the way of looking at anything should be different from others. This is what our professor Dr. Dilip Barad sir used to tell us. In paper number 204; Contemporary Western Theories and Film Studies, we have a unit of Derrida and Deconstruction. This activity is assigned by our professor Dr. Dilip sir. Here I'm going to share my views on the term deconstruction and how we can do deconstructive reading of any text, film, ad, Serial etc. So let's begin with what I have understood by the term deconstruction. 


Deconstruction is a philosophical movement spearheaded by French thinker Jacques Derrida and other critics during the 1960s. To read more about Jacques Derrida click here.




The French philosopher Jacques Derrida, who questions the fundamental conceptual distinctions, or “oppositions,” in Western philosophy through a close examination of the language and logic of philosophical and literary texts. In the 1970s the term was applied to work by Derrida, Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, and Barbara Johnson, among other scholars. In the 1980s it designated more loosely a range of radical theoretical enterprises in diverse areas of the humanities and social sciences, including—in addition to philosophy and literature—law, psychoanalysis, architecture, anthropology, theology, feminism, gay and lesbian studies, political theory, historiography, and film theory. There are three important point to be note down,


  • Meaning of a word is purely arbitrary

  • Meaning are relational

  • Language constructs our words and words gives us worldview


So, the point is that, the meaning of the word was given by the people who have authority. And now also it happens that, the privilege makes such an announcement it becomes the final statement about that. 


When some people argue that, Is  deconstruction a negative term ? Here Derrida gives the answer, it's not exactly a negative term. Because it's not a destructive activity. It's not something breaking down for the sake of destruction. But what Derrida is doing is inquiring into the condition or what causes a philosophical system to stand on its feet and fall down. So what are the conditions which make a philosophical or intellectual system possible. He inquired into the condition and why something cannot be defined. So he said that deconstruction is not destructive activity, but an inquiry into the foundations. That is why it is not a negative term. 


We can say that the seeds of deconstruction sprouted from Heidegger. Heidegger along with Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzche are three important thinkers which Derrida acknowledges in his famous essay structures and it's play and the ideas in these philosophers are in many ways continued by Derrida


According to Saussure the relationship between a word and its meaning is not natural but it's a conventional one. Derrida said that any word can be used to talk about anything technically. But what connects a word with its meaning or a signal with its meaning is the convention and convention is always social. Meaning of a word is usually thought of as something in our mind according to Saussure. But Derrida deconstructs the idea of arbitrariness. According to Derrida, arbitrariness means any word can be used to talk about anything. The relationship between the word and it's meaning is not natural but it's a conventional one. any word can be used to talk about anything technically. But what connects a word with its meaning or a signal with its meaning is the convention and convention is always social. Meaning of a word is usually thought of as something in our mind according to Saussure. But Derrida points out that the meaning of the word is nothing but the other word. This is how he deconstructs the idea of arbitrariness. 


Another important fact about the deconstruction is Yale University. The Yale university has played a very important role in propagation of Derrida's ideas. Deconstruction going into Yale became a kind of real new thing. There are four people who are associated with this school, 1.Paul de Man, 2. J. Hillis Miller, 3.Harold Bloom, 4.Geoffrey Hartman. These four people made deconstruction very popular and unpopular in America. People know them as the Yale Hermeneutic Mafia. But all of them are different in their occupations in preoccupation with literary criticism. But first time deconstruction became a school of literary criticism because of Yale. So Yale school is responsible for bringing deconstruction in literary criticism in a big way !! 


In a way Deconstruction is not a term that destroys the meaning, but it gives us ideas to think differently. There is famous lines,


"Language bears within itself the necessity of its own critique"


It means language plays a very vital role in understanding the meaning. 


"There is no truth outside the language"


Language is important and a privilege of authority. People in power can define the term and that becomes right. If we talk about the privilege of one word over other word we find these examples,


Good - Bad

Day - Night

Men - women

God - Evil

Speech - Writing

Presence - Absence

Identity - Difference

Fullness - Emptiness

Life - Death

Lightless - Darkness

Teacher - Student


The privilege words seem more powerful than other words. 


When we observe anything, for example we see the cow. What comes to our mind is 


  • It's animal, 

  • A cow that has four legs,

  • It gives us milk. 


If we look for the binary opposition of cow we see the sweet beef, that can be used as food. The cow is seen as more spiritual and religious rather than beef. So here we can understand that the meaning of anything is dependent on what we have taught about that particular thing. And when we see that thing we automatically remember it's characteristics in our mind. But it is also important to see where we seeing that particular thing. Because the meaning of that thing will change with the place. Let's take another example of duster. If you will say I want to buy a duster, then we have to see first where we are now ? It matters a lot, because the meaning of duster will change if we are not at stationary shop ! If I'm at car showroom the duster means a brand of a car and if I'm at stationary shop and classroom the duster means a cloth or brush For dusting furniture. So the meaning of a word dependent on where we are !  


And if we talk about the positive and negative meaning, what gives word positivity or negativity is the recurrent use of a word in context. Words are not positive or negative, this is the meaning; what we can give to them. 


Examples :- 


Here I want to give some examples of some advertisements, in which we see that what they should be and what actually they are.  


1] ply Advertisement :- 

 



When I was looking at this ad, I thought this ad would focus on the dhongi Baba, who eats non veg. Instead the ad was about ply of furniture. I also thought that this advertisement should show the fakeness of that dhongi Baba, but the advertisement was about the green ply ! As we see with the deconstructive reading we find the advertisement uses food as center point. We also believe that religious peoples and associated with any religion were not supposed to eat meat. We believe that some culture uses meat as their food, they are not considered as pure peoples. In this case we see that some culture have meat as their major dish. Here the food is taken as signifier. So in this way we can do deconstruction of this advertisement.


2] All Out :-



 

While watching this advertisement I thought this is about teaching moral values to the boy. But by the end of the ad we can see that the ad is about All Out. The daughter in law is silent in the ad. All her family members treated her badly, but she didn't say a word to them, because she understands everything. At the end we come to know that, this is All out, that can give us an idea to stand by tough mom. Because if you take the side of children they are not going to learn all the things. This also we have seen in R. K. Narayan's story "Crime and Punishment". Parents and family members play a very very important role in building moral  values in children's mind. Here we can see the binary oppositions of privilege of man over woman. At one point it also shows the privilege of rich over poor.


Here we see the way of teaching child. Some parents become very soft towards their children. In the ad all family members are opposed to the daughter in law, because she is becoming very strict towards her son. Then the father in law stand by her. So this is the victory of #patriarchy over #support mom ! So this is can be the deconstructive reading of the ad.


3] Maggie Masala Rishton ka Swad :-

 


Maggi Masala was once the talk of town. Advertisements are also going viral. This ad was about Maggi Masala, but it teaches a very important lesson. It doesn't speak about changing our thinking, but instead it satire on that thinking and without telling anything it tells everything. When we talk about the freedom of women, we find there are many womens who want to do jobs and become financially free. But after marriage her husband doesn't give her permission and her dreams are destroyed, what she has studied for. Why did it happen ? Because there are many people who are educated fellows. Yes, the thinking of people still belongs to the 18th century. They don't want women to be free financially. Because their power will be shared or parted. So we have to change that thinking pattern. The dominance of male over fimale also seen in the advertisement.


4] Zigy Television Commercial :-

 


Well, in the starting dialogue I thought this ad was about a daughter taking care of her mother. But this is not so. The girl was not her daughter but she is her daughter - in - law. Her son and daughter - in - law did divorce. But the relations between the girl and her mother in law are still that much stronger. This is what I thought about the ad. But the ad is about healthcare products to buy online for Women and babies. The relations between mother in law and daughter in law is like they haven't understanding in between (this is what we think and seen in television), but that though is breaking here by this advertisement. There is always missing the understanding between Sasu and Vahu. So a Vahu is taking care of her Sasu even she had divorce is the other meaning which we find here.


5] Proud to Pay Tax (Quicko.com) :-


 



This is quite an interesting ad. While watching the ad it seems like the boy is very much conscious about water and it's problem. So I thought this ad was about saving water. But the ad is about online financial services Quicko.com. It also says that we have to pay tax online and on time and to be proud of that. It also gives information how to pay tax online. 


If we think deeply we come to know that there are peoples who don't pays tax. When the tax was payed by citizens, it should be used in good events rather than using it in very absurd things. So here we arise the question that who is misusing fund of tax payers ? So we are not seeing the system that works behind it. That we have to question here.

"The Alchemist" Book Review

The Alchemist Book written by Paulo Coelho is very interesting book to read. Paulo Coelho is a Brazilian lyricist and novelist. The novel s...