Thematic Analysis of You Laughed and Laughed and Laughed

Thematic Analysis of "You Laughed and Laughed and Laughed"


Most of the African poetry deals with chaos, problems, destruction and suffering faced by the black people when they were dominated by the whites. The lyrics are an expression to regain the essence, purity, values and the innocence of the African culture that has been destroyed by the colonial experience. The poetry depicts that the suppressed are trying to retrieve the loss. (Fatima Amir)


According to Brenda Osbey


"It is with publication of Gabriel Okara‘s first poem that Nigerian literature in English and modern African poetry in this language can truly to have begun."


"You Laughed and Laughed and Laughed" is a poem by Nigerian writer Gabriel Okara. Gabriel Okara, in full Gabriel Imomotimi Gbaingbain Okara, Nigerian poet and novelist whose verse had been translated into several languages by the early 1960s. 



Okara’s poetry is based on a series of contrasts in which symbols are neatly balanced against each other. The need to reconcile the extremes of experience (life and death are common themes) preoccupies his verse, and a typical poem has a circular movement from everyday reality to a moment of joy and back to reality again. 



This poem focuses on how white people laughed at African people. There is loss of happiness due to conflict of the African cultures with the Western cultures, subjugation of the African people accompanied by loot, rape and pillage, the loss of identity of the African people, their homes being devastated, the imposing of the cultural norms of the colonizer on the colonized and the imposition of the colonizer’s language on the colonized. The literature of the African people talking about their state of freedom in the pre-colonial times contrasted with their state during the colonial times and then the promise of freedom in the deplorable state of affairs holds for them. Here is the poem,


You Laughed and Laughed and Laughed


In your ears my song

 is motor car misfiring stopping with a choking cough; and you laughed and laughed and laughed.


In your eyes my ante- natal 

walk was inhuman, passing your "omnivorous understanding" and you laughed and laughed and laughed


You laughed at my song, 

you laughed at my walk.


Then I danced my magic dance 

to the rhythm of talking drums pleading, but you shut your eyes and laughed and laughed and laughed


And then I opened my mystic inside wide like the sky, instead you entered your car and laughed and laughed and laughed


You laughed at my dance, 

you laughed at my inside. 

You laughed and laughed and laughed.


But your laughter was ice-block laughter and it froze your inside froze your voice froze your ears froze your eyes and froze your tongue.


And now it’s my turn to laugh; but my laughter is not ice-block laughter. For I know not cars, know not ice-blocks.


My laughter is the fire of the eye of the sky, the fire of the earth, the fire of the air, the fie of the seas and the rivers fishes animals trees and it thawed your inside, thawed your voice, thawed your ears, thawed your eyes and thawed your tongue.


So a meek wonder held your shadow and you whispered; 

"Why so?" 

And I answered: 

"Because my fathers and I are owned by the living warmth of the earth through our naked feet." 


Now let's see some of the themes of the poem :- 


1) Racism :- 


In the poem we see the white people think they are the colonised persons and they are superior. They don't think about other races. As the poet writes, they don't respect other cultures. By doing that they are underestimating other races and other cultures. They (white people) were tortures black people not only physically but mentally also. They are laughing on black people, at every activity they laugh at. First they were used to control them physically but after colonialism they were tortures them mentally. 


2) Cultural Conflict :- 


There is conflict between Western culture and African culture in the poem. Western culture accepted materialism and the life connected with it. But African culture became independent, so most of the things are still not at that level. White people take themselves as superior and black people as inferior. They think they are colonised and they are sent by God to colonise these inferior people. That is why they are laughing at them. Because they are still not using modern things, but they are happy in their culture. They have a connection with nature. That we can see in this line, 


"Because my fathers and I are owned by the living warmth of the earth through our naked feet." 


So it represents their barbarian life and they are happy with it. But when these white people started laughing at them, that feeling was shared here by the poet. 


3) Modernism :- 


As we know that Western culture is developed by many materialistic things but many of barbarian areas are more connected with nature, they are not using materialistic things. So the white people compare their natural things with their material things. For example,


In your ears my song is motor car misfiring stopping with a choking cough


As well as the word 'car' is used thrice in the poem, that reflects the major satire on materialistic things. In the poem the poet also satirises the upper class people, because they use these luxurious things to attract people. So we can say that poet make satire on materialistic things. 


4) Colonialism :- 


Third world countries are colonised by British and white people. Africa was also a colonised country. So it is obvious that the white people control them physically. They can't do anything without their permission. But after independence the impact of the white people remained on the mind of people. So there is mentally control also by white people. And the white people also started thinking like they are superior, so others might think that they are not white so they are inferior. Fanon says that 


In colonizers world white represents purity and black represents evil. 


That was the mentality of all. So Okara used this theme also in the prom. 


5) Nationalism :- 


In response to the laughter of white people, the poet said that they are not rude as they are, but they have something special with nature and that is why they do not laugh at others. African people have their traditional dance. Poet uses the word "Magical Dance" because when they dance they forget the pain and sadness. Further poets talked about the connection with mother earth. They have the living warmth of the earth. Why is it so connected with them ? Because they walked with naked feet. It represents the rawness and purity of the heart. So the theme of nationalism is seen in the poem. 


References 


Amir, Fatima. “A Postcolonial Critique of Gabriel Okara‟s Once Upon a Time, You Laughed  and Laughed and Laughed and Piano and Drums.” An International Peer-Reviewed English Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, May 2021. 


Fanon, Frantz. Black Skins, White Mask. NewYork, 1967. 


1182 words 

Revolution Twenty20

Revolution Twenty20


Hello to all readers, 


Today, in this blog I'm going to discuss this novel "Revolution Twenty20" by Chetan Bhagat. One of the influential writers and listed in Time magazine's list of World's 100 Most Influential People in 2010. Chetan Baghat is a rising star in the contemporary modern Indian literature, he is a multi talented personality. 



His novel "Revolution Twenty20" is about ambition, corruption, friendship and unrequited love. 


 About the Book


In Revolution Twenty20, Chetan Bhagat explores the lives of three close friends from Varanasi, set against the backdrop of India's corrupt political system. Gopal and Raghav are the best of friends. Although they hail from completely different family backgrounds they share a common passion for success and realising their dreams in life. Gopal's family has been caught up in a never-ending property dispute and he aspires to come out of the mess and amass a lot of wealth, Raghav, on the other hand, desires to bring about a revolution in the system and do something significant for the society. Their lives take a surprising turn when both of them fall in love with their mutual friend, Aarti. Gopal gives in to the corrupt system but Raghav tries to set things right. This situation turns the friends against each other. Will Raghav be successful in bringing about a social change or will he succumb to his desires like Gopal? Who will Aarti choose to spend the rest of her life with? Revolution Twenty20 will make for a riveting read for all Chetan Bhagat fans. 



Now let's discuss some questions regarding the novel. 


1)If you were to adapt this novel for the screen, what sort of changes would you make in the story and characters to make it better than the novel?


If I adapt this novel for the screen I will change the narrative technique first. Because Chetan Bhagat uses this narrative technique in most of his novels, it is now familiar to people. So I'll try to use another technique, like I use a technique where Raghav, Aarti and Gopal all tell the story with their perspective. So we can get an idea about the thinking of these three major characters of the novel. 


Second, I'll change the end of the novel. I'll end with a positive change by Raghav. Raghav brought the Revolution and it impacted people. 


I'll make the theme of Revolution stronger than the theme of love. 


The character of Aarti is doubtable in the novel. So I'll make it stronger and more reliable. 


The most important change I'll make is the character of Gopal. Gopal understood his mistake, he also thought about Aarti and Raghav. But the corruption he did and got the position of director, he doesn't want to leave that place. So in the screening I would like to make him understand his mistake and leave that place of director and hire a more eligible person as director. 


2) 'For a feminist reader, Aarti is a sheer disappointing character.' Do you agree with this statement? If yes, what sort of characteristics would you like to see in Aarti? If you disagree with this statement, why? What is it in Aarti that you are satisfied with this character?


Yes, I agree that Aarti is a sheer disappointing character. As a feminist reader we find Aarti's character is portrayed as weak in compare of other characters. She belongs to a rich family even though her parents and grandparents have political backgrounds and they are also educated. But Aarti has no attitude towards her life and future. 


She doesn't even know with whom she wants to live. When Raghav passes the entrance exam for Kota she likes him and is attracted towards his educational qualifications. But when Gopal becomes rich she is ready to stay with him. 


She hasn't any kind of hope in her life. We can see where she wanted to become an air hostess but then she started working in the Ramada Hotel. 


3)'For a true revolutionist, the novel is terribly disappointing.' Do you agree? If yes, what sort of changes would you make in character or situation to make it a perfect revolutionary novel? If you disagree, what is in the novel that you are satisfied with? 


Yes, I totally agree with that 'For a true revolutionist, the novel is terribly disappointing'. Because as we know the novel focuses on love rather than revolution. 


I would like to make these changes :-


Raghav's character represents revolution. He wanted to change society through revolution. But he faced a very bad time during this process, but in the end he didn't get a reward which had an impact on people. People don't follow him because they can easily give an excuse that, "you will also face problems and at the end you will get nothing like Raghav ! " So at the end I'll make justice for Raghav that he brought revolution in society. The system of corruption has changed and he becomes part of parliament. This can be an appropriate end according to my view. 


Thank you ! 

Comparison of The Hungry Tide and Gun Island

Comparison Between The Hungry Tide and Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh


Abstract


This research paper discusses the comparison between The Hungry Tide and Gun Island. Amitav Ghosh used many things similar in both novels. At first glance it seems like Gun Island is a sequel to The Hungry Tide; though the researcher tried to prove whether Gun Island is sequel to The Hungry Tide or not. During the journey of both the works people can get the idea of Bengali Myth which novelist used in both novels. 


Key Words :- Comparison, Contrast, The Hungry Tide, Myth, Gun Island, Amitav Ghosh


Introduction 


Amitav Ghosh is a well known contemporary Indian writer and the winner of the 54th Jnanpith award. Amitav Ghosh was born in Calcutta in 1956 and raised and educated in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Iran, Egypt, India and the United Kingdom, where the author received Ph.D. in social anthropology from Oxford. Acclaimed for fiction, travel writing and journalism, author's books include The Circle of Reason, The Shadow Lines, In an Antique Land and Dancing in Cambodia. Author's previous novel, The Glass Palace, was an international bestseller that sold more than a half-million copies in Britain.  Ghosh has won France's Prix Medici Etranger, India's prestigious Sahitya Akademi Award, the Arthur C. Clarke Award and the Pushcart Prize. Author now divides time between Harvard University, where he is a visiting professor and author's homes in India and Brooklyn, New York. People get the references of these places and also observe the influence of the writer's motherland in both the novels. 


The Hungry Tide (2004) is the sixth novel by Amitav Ghosh. It won the 2004 Hutch Crossword Book Award for Fiction. The Hungry Tide has been translated in twelve foreign countries and is also a bestseller abroad. Gun Island is a beautifully realised novel which effortlessly spans space and time. It is the story of a world on the brink of increasing displacement and unstoppable transition. But it is also a story of hope, of a man whose faith in the world and the future is restored by two remarkable women. Bundook. Gun. A common word, but one which turns Deen Datta's world upside down. 



Contrast Between The Hungry Tide and Gun Island


After analysing both novels the researcher found that there are some contrast between both novels. There are more characters in Gun Island. "The Hungry Tide" is told with two perspectives of Kenai Datta and Piyali Roy but "Gun Island" is told with Deen's perspective. Kanai is a translator and Deen is a rare book dealer. The Hungry Tide is the story where Piya and Kanai are going to Lusibari and their works as researcher and translator, where in Gun Island the Deen's journey starts with the visit of Nilila and then to the shrine in Sundarban and Venice. 


Similarities between The Hungry Tide and Gun Island


Obviously if readers have read both novels they must think that both novels have many similarities. Not only in characters but also in some incidents. The characters like Piya Roy, Kenai Datt, and Nilima boss, Tipu, Moyna, Fokir and Horen are similar characters in both novels. Piya Roy is portrayed as a dolphin researcher in both novels. The journey started in the novel The Hungry Tide and in Gun Island it goes further. In both novels the author used Bengali myth or folklore, which clearly shows the connection of author with this language and it's folk tales and the place also. Kusum dies in the novel The Hungry Tide and Cinta dies in Gun Island. 


Use of Bengali Myth


As a Bengali writer, readers find the attachment to the motherland of the author in these works. One can ask here why writers use myths in their works.  In article Myth Criticism of Northrop Frye, NASRULLAH MAMBROL said, 


Myth criticism drew upon the anthropological and psychological bases of myths; rituals and folktales to restore the spiritual content to the alienated, fragmented world ruled by scientism, empiricism and technology. Myth criticism regarded the creation of myth (with its association with magic, imagination, dreams etc.) as integral to human thought; and myth as the collective attempt of cultures to establish a meaningful context to human existence. Literature is viewed as emerging out of a core of myth, and as a “system” based on “recurrent patterns”. These parameters were also reflected in other contemporary movements such as Structuralism and Jungian concept of the “collective unconscious” Frye argued that literature drew upon transcendental genres such as romance (summer), tragedy (autumn), irony/satire (winter) and comedy (spring). These four genres constitute a ‘central unifying myth’. (Nasrullah Mambrol) 


When Amitav Ghosh in his interview to The Hindu was asked about his employment of human/non-human issues in the book his answer to M. Kapoor is as follows: 


 … we are seeing is an upheaval that is overturning everything that we ever knew about the world, everything is changing… the primary literary challenge of our time is to give voice to the non-human. …Those boundaries never existed. Even … Greek mythology, it is filled with non-humans of many different kinds…a kind of inspiration to go back to the literatures … It is really true that often you can find in the past sources of regeneration,… (Ghosh, 2019) 

 

In one or another way the author wants to use Bengali myth, because the author himself is Bengali. In The Hungry Tide, Bon Bibi's myth is used. 


Bon bibi‟s myth is ethnologically internalized by Fokir, who prays to her in order to appease the spirit of the forest, because he knows that in the tide country, a greater force rules the spirit that lies beyond the control of the human beings. (Nilanjan Chakraborty)


Is Gun Island Sequel to The Hungry Tide ? 


The question which arises in every reader's mind is, whether Gun Island is a sequel to The Hungry Tide or not ? After reading the summary of both novels, the first thought that comes to every reader's mind is yes ! It is a sequel to Gun Island. But it is not so. In one article, Mandira Nayar says


Amitav Ghosh's new book, Gun Island, is his first standalone novel since the Ibis trilogy. “After the trilogy, I was just dying to get back to fiction,” he says. ... The book is not a sequel, but Piya Roy is a central figure, and is still following the dolphins. Fans of The Hungry Tide will immediately recognise her no-nonsense self. ( Mandira Nayar) 


For the answer of this question, Keshava Guha writes, "Gun Island is not the first novel in which Ghosh has answered his own call to arms. It is a sequel of sorts to The Hungry Tide (2004), which examined the impact of climate change on the Sundarbans. Many of the characters in that novel reappear here, most notably the Bengali-American marine biologist Piya Roy." (Keshava Guha)


Climate Change


To begin with, we have seen that The Hungry Tide leads to a reflection on the human and non-human world, on the opposition between nature and culture, and between the global and the local. Ghosh's reflection favours a vision of the world in which its constitutive parts are seen as interdependent and interconnected. This means that everything is connected and that climate change cannot be solved unless it is seen as a problem that encompasses the natural world and the world of humans. Considering this, The Hungry Tide can be read in light of eco-cosmopolitanism, which promotes the understanding of the world as co-extensive and inclusive, connecting the human with what lies beyond its boundaries. While interconnectedness lies at the heart of the novel, Ghosh insists on the duty of writers to use their power to write about it and provoke a reaction, which will lead to an increased awareness. Indeed, the general passivity in the face of climate change also translates into the denial of predictions, as was the case for Piddington and Port Canning. These warnings are also present in Gun Island and represent the failure to imaginatively grasp the consequences of climate change. (Mathilde, Dutrieux)


In Gun Island Ghosh draws attention to the serious problem of climate change and human trafficking with the help of myth. Ghosh uses the myth of Manasa Devi and wants to tell us that Gun Merchant changes the places because of climate change and during that journey he realises the problem of migration. The whole story is about the pilgrimage of Gun merchant as well as of Dinanath, Sundarban to Venice and to Sicily. Both characters and the events are connected with each other. It is a kind of similar story. 


Purpose of Writing


Every writer has a special message in their works, that is why they took help of various myths. But people always took it wrong, they started believing in the myths and connected it with their sentiments. Nilanjan Chakraborty talked about how Amitav Ghosh gave his reason for choosing the novel as a form to express his thoughts as an artist. He says,


For me, the value of the novel as a form is that it is able to incorporate elements of every aspect of life – history, natural history, rhetoric, politics, beliefs, religion, family love, sexuality. As I see it, the novel lets you write anything you want to, as long as what you write remains pertinent to the bigger story. You create a world where you can include every part of you and the usual distinctions between historian, journalist, anthropologist dissolve.

  • Amitav Ghosh



Conclusion


So this research paper provides the comparison of both novels "The Hungry Tide" and "Gun Island". There are some characters that are the same in both novels. Both stories are about the journey of the main characters in The Hungry Tide Kanai & Piya and in Gun Island Deen. There is use of Bengali myth; in The Hungry Tide Bon Bibi's myth and in Gun Island Manasa Devi's myth. 


References 


Chakraborty, Nilanjan. “Myth Formation  in the Fiction of  Chinua Achebe and Amitav Ghosh.” Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020. 


Chakraborty, Nilanjan. “Myth, Politics and Ethnography in Amitav Ghosh’s  The Hungry Tide.” Www.ijhssi.org, vol. 2, no. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 24–28. 


Ghosh, Amitav. (2019, june 19). "For me story telling very close tied to uncanniness". The Hindu. (M. kapoor, Interviewer)


Guha, Keshava. Review of Gun Island By Amitav Ghosh, Literary Review, July 2019. 


Mambrol, Nasrullah. “Myth Criticism of Northrop Frye.” Literary Theory and Criticism, 21 Aug. 2019, https://literariness.org/2016/03/21/myth-criticism-of-northrop-frye/


Mathilde, Dutrieux. Climate Change in Amitav Ghosh's the Great Derangement ... https://matheo.uliege.be/bitstream/2268.2/12071/4/Dutrieux%20Mathilde_TFE%202021.pdf


Nayar, Mandira. “Amitav Ghosh Returns to New World with His Book 'Gun Island'.” The Week, The Week, 22 June 2019, https://www.theweek.in/theweek/leisure/2019/06/21/amitav-ghosh-returns-to-new-world-with-his-book-gun-island.html.   


Presentation on Final Solution

Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper : Indian English Literature – Post -Independence



Here is my YouTube video on this presentation :



Presentation on Nationalism and Rabindranath Tagore

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper :  Indian English Literature – Pre-Independence



Here is my video on this presentation : 



Presentation on Gayatri Spivak and Subaltern

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper : Cultural Studies


Here is my presentation video : 



Presentation on Ecocriticism and Postcolonial Studies

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper : The Postcolonial Studies


Here is my presentation video : 



Presentation on Digital Humanities

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper : Contemporary Western Theories and Film Studies



This is my YouTube video on this presentation :



Presentation on Long Day's Journey into Night as a Tragedy

Hello learners !

Here is my presentation on paper : The American Literature


Here is my video on this presentation :



Presentation on Five School of Indian Aesthetic

Hello learners !

Here is my presentation on paper : Indian Aesthetic and Criticism



My video about this presentation :



Presentation on Alterity and Tragic Sensation in Macbeth & The Great Gatsby

Hello learners !

Here is my presentation on paper : 21st Century Literature -1 


My presentation video :



Presentation on Comparison of Waiting for Godot and Look Back in Anger

Hello learners ! 

Here is my presentation on paper : 21st Century Literature -2


Here is my YouTube video on this presentation :



Presentation on Absurd Theatre

Hello learners ! 

Here is my presentation on paper : History of 20th Century Literature



Here is my video on this presentation :



Presentation on Comparison between Romantics and Victorians

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper no. 105 (A) History of English Literature



My video on this presentation :



Presentation on Double Life in Importance of Being Earnest

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper no. 104 Literature of Victorians



My YouTube video on this presentation :



Presentation on Pride and Prejudice

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper no. 103 Literature of Romantics 


Here is my presentation video :



Presentation : Virtue and Morality in Pamela

 Hello all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper no. 102 Literature of Neo-classical



My YouTube video on this presentation :



Presentation on Metaphysical Poetry

Hello 👋 all ☺️

Here is my presentation on paper no. 101 Renaissance Literature.



My video on this presentation :



Presentations

Hello learners ! 

Myself Latta Baraiya. I have prepared this blog because it is easy to find all the presentation at one place. 




So here you will find all my presentations (PPT & Video), which I have submitted to Department of English MKBU. 


✍️Semester 1


✍️Semester 2


✍️Semester 3

✍️Semester 4

  1. The African Literature
  2. Contemporary Literatures in English
  3. Comparative Literature & Translation Studies
  4. Research Methodology
  5. Research Project Writing : Dissertation Writing








"The Alchemist" Book Review

The Alchemist Book written by Paulo Coelho is very interesting book to read. Paulo Coelho is a Brazilian lyricist and novelist. The novel s...